People who worry about what audio product sound like can be divided into those who need to hump — scientifically — something sound unspoiled and those who digest by the sure-enough Duke Ellington byword , “ If it sounds practiced it IS upright . ”
When it come to evaluating audio frequency products not even professional reviewers agree on whether there should be an accusative or subjective measure . A couple of recent posts by well - respected audio wonks — who pass to be Quaker with each other — concisely lay out the arguments on both side .
Some people conceive science can tell them what sounds serious . Brent Butterworth atSound + Visionjust print a really nice primer on sound measure and why it matter . In his scene the perfect loudspeaker has “ flat sound ” meaning it reproduces tint at the same grade across the across the spectrum of audible sound frequencies . In other words they output on the nose what you put into them . ( Note : Your earphone should NOT have flat response . ) Using just a microphone and software program you could test a mathematical product and know its caliber . Flat speakers are better because they reproduce sound that is objectively true to a recording .
exquisitely , but there ’s no soulfulness in that position — at least according to a post by Steve Guttenberg atThe Audiophiliac . verbaliser that sound serious just freaking sound good . Guttenberg says he ’s try mint of intelligent system designed by engineers with their new measurement tool and been very discomfited with the resolution . Something that objectively value up might go atrocious just as something can sound safe because of its imperfections . Humans are a particular bunch .
So what ’s it gon na be ? Science or soul ? Check out the C. W. Post and resolve for yourself . [ Sound + Vision&The Audiophiliac ; figure : Flickr ]
audioScience
Daily Newsletter
Get the skilful tech , science , and polish news program in your inbox day by day .
News from the future , cede to your nowadays .
You May Also Like
