This calendar week , the internet’scollective chortlingat aparticularly yonic stadiumfor Qatar ’s World Cupmay have actually doomedthe projection to forsaking . But it ’s hardly the first — or most overt — anatomical architecture in late eld . In fact , it ’s just the tardy in a centuries - cross tradition .
https://jezebel.com/qatars-new-world-cup-stadium-will-look-like-a-giant-va-1466640033
Of course , most buildings end up being phallic , simply out of structural necessity . stack floor upon editorial upon flooring , in unsmooth terms , create a phallic building . But the sinuous curve and constituent shapes of female anatomy ? That ’s a hard proposition , structurally verbalize .
But first of all : When did humans take up plan building — consciously or not — based on their own bodies ? The tradition goes way back to Roman emperor and profligate architect Vitruvius — who introduced the idea that buildings should be based on the canonical proportionality of the human consistency . Remember Da Vinci ’s famous Vitruvian Man ? Same dude .
There ’s an environmental logical system to phallic architecture , too : After all , the immense legal age of build protrude out of the earth , rather than into it . In those wide-eyed terms , all architecture that moves upward is phallic and all architecture that pierces the ground is vaginal — right down to our subway tunnels :
London Underground Night - Shift Workers . Image : Getty / Peter Macdiarmid
But there ’s more than one linear perspective from which to judge a building — what about the way a space is organized , or what it looks like from the inside ? Is it possible that we ’re build womanly building — flop alongside our male unity — without even being aware of it ?
That ’s exactly what Gloria Steinem described in her prolusion to the Vagina Monologues :
In the seventies … I found an obscure history of religious computer architecture that take on a fact as if it were plebeian cognition : the traditional purpose of most patriarchal building of worship imitate the distaff trunk . Thus , there is an outer and inner entrance , labia majora and labia minora ; a primal vaginal gangway toward the communion table ; two curved ovarian complex body part on either side ; and then in the sacred heart , the altar or womb , where the miracle takes place — where males give birth .
In other words , architects — male person and female!—build vaginal computer architecture without even being cognizant of it . It ’s only when we see a specially , uh , figurative construction , that we realise what we ’ve done .
But chance event - Freudian or not — doesn’t excuse the proliferation of gargantuan vagina construction over the past hundred . For that , we can thank Modernism in general , the epoch that brought us a dizzying regalia of new building eccentric — not only rational ones , but also slew , organic ones .
Take Dutch designer Hendrik Wijdeveld ’s deep vaginal People ’s Theatre , designed in 1918 :
Early New flights of fondness like Wijdeveld ’s informed late crusade , from the incredible organic concrete eggshell of Eero Saarinen ’s 1962 TWA Terminal at JFK :
Photo : Ezra Stoller
To the elastic curves of 1970s Googieism , see here in a paraboloid ceiling of a Kansas gas station once course by Vickers Petroleum Company :
Image : Wichita Photos .
Even in the midst of the Po - Mo 1980s , female shapes popped up . Architect Sheldon Schlegman design Chicago ’s Crain Communications Building , a tower whose diamond - shape top has earned it the nickname “ the vagina construction : ”
Image : Keith Garner .
During the same old age as Schlegman was unwittingly earn his way into the gendered architecture history books , another designer was working on entirely intentional anatomical design : The Swiss set couturier H.R. Giger , whose work on the set of Alien made him celebrated :
Giger ’s drawings would go on to charm a new generation of architects who , thanks to the Second Coming of digital modeling , could actually bring the lithe forms of Giger ’s work into reality .
Zaha Hadid , the most illustrious arbiter of the movement , has brought those digital experiments of the eighties — when she was an computer architecture student — into reality in the 21st century . After all , Al Wakrah Stadium , is hardly the first Hadid construction to be called out for its anatomic specificity :
Zaha Hadid ’s Tokyo Olympic Stadium .
Foster + Partners — the architects behind London ’s famously priapic Gherkin — have participated in the course , as well . See their innovation for Virgin Galactic ’s Spaceport America :
Even marvelous buildings — like Kenzo Tange ’s Mode Gakuen Cocoon Tower , a 17 - account tower in Tokyo — can be sculptural to the extent that they suggest distaff forms :
range : Noli Fernan “ Dudut ” Perez
But a building does n’t have to look organic to gather compare . One of Beijing ’s most recognisable building , the CCTV Tower — known locally as “ the big underpants”—has been compared to lady character ( it ’s also beencompared to a sexuality routine , actually ):
Image : Iwan Baan .
Why ? Because it ’s form like an “ O , ” rather than an “ I , ” a form made potential by geomorphological engine driver Ole Scheeren ’s first - of - its - variety structural exoskeleton :
Dmitry Foronov / Wikimedia .
Which brings us to a third , unexamined explanation for the late proliferation of vaginal building : The rapid - fire pace at which structural engine room has developed over the retiring few decades .
Most skyscrapers are phallic simply because of our special power to fight sombreness .
What all of these edifice have in common — from paraboloid concrete roof of the sixties to the gravity - defying arcs of the 2000s — is that they were spurred by major leaps in build engineering . Engineering wonders like super - columns , extreme cantilevers , and blade exoskeletons have let us move beyond the genus Phallus — a dim-witted ikon — into more complex shapes , which most of us identify as womanly :
In other Good Book , designer are design more “ vaginal ” building because they can . Advanced building technology are allow us to move beyond phallocentric architecture . We should n’t just celebrate them for promoting anatomical equality , though — we should lionise them because , much like their intake , they are marvels of engineering .
Lead Image : Chris Ubik
ArchitectureDesignHistory
Daily Newsletter
Get the best tech , science , and refinement news in your inbox daily .
News from the future , deliver to your nowadays .
You May Also Like
